I have recently replaced a totally knackered 10 year old Canon MiniDV camcorder with a Panasonic HDC-SD9. It’s a great little camera and I’m happy at the idea of waving bye-bye to tape. I loath tape. Having to wind through it and always having the possibility of a tape chewing incident. The HDC-SD9 records high definition video to an SD card (as the name suggests).
Where tape did have an advantage was ease of archiving. If you wanted to keep the original footage then you just kept the MiniDV tape you shot it onto. Simple.
The SD card is great, but until 8GB SD cards are as cheap as MiniDV tapes are now then it’s not viable to keep the original footage on the SD card.
I’ve only shot a few test sequences with the HDC-SD9 so far, getting used to the camera and getting a work flow sorted out to deal with importing, editing and archiving the high definition video. I’m more of a still photographer, video is fun of course, but the main reason I want a video camera is for footage of my 5 year old daughter. I would have been happy to get a standard definition camcorder, but it seemed a retrograde step to me. In years to come I would have been kicking myself at the low quality of the standard definition footage. The HDC-SD9 was way cheaper than the old Canon standard definition camera was when I bought it ten years ago.
I did do some reading up before purchase and discovered that to stand any chance of dealing with the AVCHD encoded footage on a Mac I needed to have and Intel Mac with iLife 08 installed or a tool called VoltaicHD which would convert the AVCHD files to .MOV files (albeit pretty slowly).
I had an Intel Mac with iLife 08, so I was away, right?
Well, sort of…
Yes, I could plug in the HDC-SD9 and iMovie 08 saw the camera and offered to import the video clips. Hurrah! It was all working as planned. I was able to edit together some very short and simple test movies and export them in various formats – excellent!
Until…
With my still photography I like to keep all my RAW files archived, I have them on a big external HDD and also on DVDs. If I ever want to work with the original data at some time in the future then I have my digital “negatives” and I can re-process as I want to. I can fit quite a lot of RAW images onto a DVD – it’s manageable.
With my old MiniDV camcorder then I could keep the tapes, as mentioned above. Simple.
So, let me see where iMovie has imported my video to and then I can just bung that out to a recordable DVD for archiving. Sounds nice and easy…
Erm. This 8 minute clip I was playing with seems to have produced 6 gigabytes worth of data? Okay, I knew that hi-def would generate some large files, but my SD card is only 8GB and will hold about an hour recorded at the highest quality settings.
What’s going on?
Well, iMovie is reading the original AVCHD files from the camera and then transcoding the video to a .MOV file. The original AVCHD file is around 1 gigabyte for this 8 minute clip, so it has expanded by a factor of around 6 times in the process of importing it into iMovie, admittedly at the highest size and quality settings.
This is all fine for producing a finished movie, but for archiving? A full hour of footage is going to be many tens of gigabytes and how am I going to archive that realistically?
First thought – find the original AVCHD files on the SD card and copy them off to DVD. Much smaller files, much more workable. Well, yes, but… iMovie 08 will not then open the original AVCHD files on their own, it insists on only importing them from the camera.
I finally twigged a solution at this point. If iMovie wouldn’t work with the AVCHD file (stored with a .MTS file extension) alone then there had to be something else it needed on the SD card.
So, my solution :-
1) Connect the camera.
2) Camera appears on desktop as a disk called “no name”.
3) Make a disk image (using Disk Utility) of the complete file structure of the SD card.
4) Remove the camera.
5) Open the disk image.
OS X complains at me that it might be a damaged disk image (not quite sure what that is about, further investigation required) and gives me dire warnings of potential damage and loss of life etc… However once that disk image is open I can fire up iMovie 08 and it sees the disk image as if I had plugged in the camera. It needs the whole file structure in order to work.
Now I can save the disk image file to a DVD and keep my archive of original footage. Of course when I want to use that footage again I have to accept that iMovie will inflate the files to something like 6 times their original size, but that imported video can then be deleted once I’m done working with it.
It feels a bit strange to find myself in a situation where OS X has some catching up to do when working with video files. Macs are supposed to be the multimedia platform of choice, right?
AVCHD was developed by Sony and Panasonic who traditionally have tailored their products for the Windows platform, virtually ignoring OS X. I’m just glad to have found a solution that will leave me with my original footage in a usable format without the outlay of more money, well no more than the price of blank DVD media of course.
Technorati Tags: AVCHD, HDC-SD9, hi-def, ilife 08, mac, OS X, Panasonic, iMovie 08, video






August 20, 2008 at 11:18 pm
SX5 AVCHD camcorder also records in standard definition, while the smaller, SD5 records only in high definition. Life Movies
January 22, 2009 at 8:48 pm
Can you give me more information on saving raw footage?
February 6, 2009 at 5:17 pm
That’s all well and good, until…
If you use the entire 32 gig internal card for one continuous movie for an event such as a wedding and make a disc image of it, how are you going to archive that size image on a DVD? That’s my dilemma. I am on a G5 dual 2.5 Mac. (it’s not broke, why buy a new $3500 machine?) Voltaic works great overnight. In the morning I’m ready to edit in FCS 6. But how do I save the original file?
Good story, though.
August 2, 2009 at 7:23 pm
Ken – firstly sorry for not coming back to you for several months. Real life has got in the way of my blogging and I intend to get back into it now.
The only thing I can think of to be honest is to use hard drives to keep the videos on. This will likely get quite expensive, as you would need at least one large drive for “online” use and at least one for backing up – preferably more than one. And for online use I would say it may be best to go for a raid array of some kind. There are some excellent NAS (network attached storage) boxes out there, made by Netgear and others which I would think would do the job. That’s the kind of thing I would invest in myself if I was more serious about video than I am.
I would have a NAS device with as much storage as I could afford – and very importantly a couple of big portable drives which are big enough to back that up to. The backup drives needn’t necessarily be raided – but more than one backup drive so that one can be kept offsite. Even if the offsite backup is just kept at work, or a relatives house it is safer than having all your backups in one place.
August 2, 2009 at 7:54 pm
You can go the Blue-Ray data disc route. 25 gig discs in bulk are about $6. Of course, a stand-alone Blue-Ray writer for Mac will cost about $300-$400 at this point in time. Perhaps Snow Leopard will support Blue-Ray and the costs will come down.
August 2, 2009 at 7:59 pm
Hey Ken.
Wow, like I take 6 months to reply to you and you take just half an hour to reply to my reply :^)
Yeah, Blue-Ray is an option I guess, but one I had kinda discounted on cost grounds for now. Prices will certainly come down. I can remember paying about £200 for a CD writer (4 speed I seem to remember) and about £5 a disk and now both drives and media are at silly low prices, same goes for DVD. BlueRay will get there too.